Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Rodger LINDH, Appellee, v. Janis SURMAN, Appellant. Argued March 8, 1999. Decided Nov. 23, 1999. Reargument Denied Dec. 21, 1999. Purchaser of engagement ring appealed arbitration decision that awarded ring to his former fiancee. After bench trial, the Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County, Civil Division, No. AR 0318394, Mazur, J., [...]
Archive for the ‘janicelaw4judgecourt4’ Category
fact of this case?
Posted by Admin on December 9th, 2010
Posted in janicelaw4judgecourt4 
Tags: appellee, arbitration decision, bench trial, cappy, castille, conditional gift, court of common pleas, court of common pleas allegheny county, dissenting opinion, engagement gift, engagement ring, fiancee, joanne ross, lindh, marriage proposal, mazur, nigro, saylor, supreme court of pennsylvania, zappala 
1 Comment »Most supporters say no harm is using fake documents for better life it hurts no one would they support police?
Posted by Admin on December 9th, 2010
Most supporters say no harm is using fake documents for better life it hurts no one. Would they support police dismissing charges against these people for their only aim is to help others have a better life and users of fake documents do pay taxes for which they will never get back.Would supporters be open [...]
Posted in janicelaw4judgecourt4 Tags: alfredo, arrest warrants, auto theft, barron, better life, cabello, car registrations, deputies, eda, el pantano, fake documents, false information, fraud unit, government records, mail route, montgomery county sheriff, montgomery county tax assessor, padilla, tax fraud, title transfers 1 Comment »